Archive for the Lobbying Category

Se acordó hacer la mesa de diálogo en la banqueta de la calle, en frente del edificio ocupado.

We received this press release from CUC:

LAS POLITICAS IMPLEMENTADAS DE ESTE GOBIERNO NO RESUELVEN LA CONFLICTIVIDAD AGRARIA.

Durante este gobierno se ha dado una oleada de desalojos violentos, asesinatos y persecución de los dirigentes de las comunidades que luchan por la recuperación y defensa de la madre  tierra.
 
La política de desagrarización de la conflictividad Rural no se resuelve con la creación de otros fondos como el caso de la reactivación de la economía campesina, la compra de fincas rápidas sin profundizar en la certeza jurídica de la propiedad, los programas de arrendamiento de tierras,  por parte del MAGA; por otra parte está la política de créditos individuales por parte del Fondo de Tierras, la creación de los centros de arbitraje agrario que sólo vienen a generar dispersión y gastos innecesarios para evadir de fondo la crisis agraria.

Por otra parte, la compra de tierras improductivas, la sobrevaloración de tierras, la falta de capital de trabajo, la facilitación de los medios de producción que han accesado  a la tierra ha agudizado más  pobreza y extrema pobreza en el campo y la ciudad. Por lo anteriormente expuesto,

SOLICITAMOS

1.Suspender las amenazas de desalojos a las comunidades que han accesado a tierras por parte del Fondo de Tierras y Banrural.
2.La renegociación de los créditos atorgados a través del Fondo de Tierras, en base a un nuevo avalúo de las fincas.
3.La condonación de las deudas de algunas fincas que no tienen posibilidades de pago.

¡La tierra es Nuestra Madre, no se compra ni se vende, se recupera y se DEFIENDE!

Comité de Unidad Campesina CUC, miembro de CNOC, MICSP, WAKIB’ KEJ, CLOC Y Vía Campesina

You can see more photos of the occupation and protest organised by CUC and CNOC at FONTIERRAS here.

Thanks Mikkel Moldrup-Lakjer for this information. The copy of the Act that was signed by FONTIERRAS, CNOC and CUC is attached.

Print Friendly

This is a clip from CBC's On The Map with Avi Lewis where he interviews Andrew Grant of Skye Resources Limited for the corporate point of view. You can see the full programme here with a documentary report from CBC correspondent, Jean-Michel LePrince. The programme was aired 20 June this year.

“In the 1970's, nickel giant, Inco mined the site near the town of El Estor. The company left a ghost town behind in 1981 as the civil war in Guatemala raged. Now the price of nickel is at a twenty year high and a Canadian company is back.

Skye Resources, based in Vancouver, bought the land from Inco and is ramping up to start production. If you talk to the company, the community is solidly behind them and if you talk to the mayor, you'll hear the same thing.”

Print Friendly

Amnesty International have just released the following press release about the CICIG which was CICIACS in a previous encarnation;

Guatemala: Congress must ratify UN-backed commission against impunity

The Guatemalan Congress must urgently ratify the new International Commission Against Impunity (CICIG) if the country is to tackle clandestine criminal groups, said Amnesty International today.

Once approved by Congress, the UN-sponsored CICIG will act in support of the Public Prosecutor's Office, suggesting methods of investigation and presenting evidence. The Public Prosecutor's Office will have ultimate responsibility for deciding whether or not to pursue an investigation.

“The existence and operations of clandestine groups severely undermines respect for the rule of law and human rights” said Sebastian Elgueta, Amnesty International's researcher for Guatemala. “The CICIG could become a valuable contributor in the fight against clandestine criminal groups and the impunity they enjoy.”

The CICIG is an extremely important step in the fight against impunity and clandestine groups operating in Guatemala. There is grave concern that if the ratification of CICIG is not made a priority by all political parties, it will fail to advance.

“It is now over three years since initial proposals were discussed to establish an international commission to investigate clandestine criminal groups. The longer discussions and agreements are delayed, the more entrenched criminal networks become in state institutions and the more difficult it becomes to purge the system.”

Amnesty International welcomes the international support that the CICIG initiative has received. The organization calls on the Congress of Guatemala to maintain the engagement of the international community and to show a real commitment to the protection of human rights by approving the CICIG without delay.

Print Friendly

This is a recent press release from CIFCA about the current trade negotiations between the EU and Central American governments.

The European Union wants to accelerate the negotiation of an WTO Plus agreement with Central America

Oxfam International, the International Federation for Human Rights -FIDH-, the Coalition of the Flemish North-South Movement/-11.11.11-, the National Center of Cooperation for Development -CNCD/11.11.11-, Grupo Sur and the Copenhagen Initiative for Central America and Mexico -CIFCA-,

…we consider that the European Union doesn’t fulfill with its foreign relations duties that consists in promoting sustainable economical and social development for developing countries, fight against poverty – including the fulfillment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG)- established in the Article 177 of the Treaty on European Union and the European Consensus on Development of November 2005.

The European Union, on the initiative of the German presidency, has invited the Central American -CA- vice Ministers for Trade to come the next 15th of June in order to establish a dialogue with the European Commission, putting aside the previous requirements to establish a Central American trade and tariff barriers union, it seems that the EU would be satisfied with a mere framework agreement between the Central American Governments, to announce the starting of the negotiations of an EU-CA Association Agreement and a biregional Free-Trade Zone.

The EU, following its Global Europe: competing in the world strategy, includes through these Agreements the issues of investments, competition and government procurement – the so-called Singapore Issues-, as it has been made obvious with the exclusion of the explicit reference to the ILO Agreement n°169 on indigenous people that guaranty their autonomy and the obligation to consult them on policies or investments that could affect their rights, during the approbation by the Council of the EU of the negotiation mandate the last 23rd of April.

The E.U. is prioritizing the expansion of its own economic interests, setting apart an adequate acknowledgement of the asymmetries that would retain a correspondence with the reality of poverty and inequality that prevail in Central America. By this way, the Association Agreement will not contribute to reach Social Cohesion, considered as a priority for the EU cooperation strategy for the region.

The inclusion of the so-called Singapore Issues, excluded from the negotiations in the WTO since 2004, entails strict restrictions for each country to define its own development pattern, grants the European companies with the possibility to operate with the same equality conditions as local companies, putting the latest at a vulnerability level that brings effect on the development and the right to work at a national level ; shrinks the governmental capacity to guarantee the right to an healthy environment, the right to food and to ensure the right to health.

Moreover, the EU, with this kind of agreements would infringe the right to development of CA, and the adequate protection of its natural resources, it would affect the enjoyment of their rights by indigenous and afrodescendant people: it would affect the right of self-determination of the peoples to determine their own model of development.

In any case, and if the Agreement was to be negotiated, it should allow Central American countries and communities to preserve their sovereignty over their natural resources, including the continued use of restrictions on exports, investments and intellectual property rights claims. Therefore, legitimate domestic laws, regulations, policy instruments and standards aimed at protecting the environment and biodiversity, at promoting the sustainable use of natural resources or at preventing or mitigating global warming, should be excluded from the negotiations on ˜non-tariff barriers’.

For these reasons, as signing organizations, we urge the public opinion to ASK for the negotiations to be carried on in total transparency, substantial and relevant information, open participation of all the sectors that can be affected by the issues negotiated and reject contents and mechanisms that can violate human rights.

Print Friendly

We got sent a copy of this letter from Human Rights First. The story was quoted in the Washington Post:

“In over six years since the petitions were filed, there has been little discernable progress in the cases,” the U.S. congressmen said in their letter yesterday to Attorney General Juan Luis Florido. “We do not believe that the delay can be adequately explained by the replacement of Special Prosecutors and procedural appeals by the defendants.”

Andrew Hudson of the Human Rights Defenders program, part of Human Rights First, a nonprofit organization based in New York and Washington , suggested that prosecution of the Rios Montt case would have broad consequences.

“It is important to bring the perpetrators of serious human rights violations to justice in order to break the culture of impunity and create a safer environment for human rights defenders,” he said.

Print Friendly

The UK Goverment has just launched a new strategy paper for Latin America. The paper was set out by Lord Triesman on 28th March in Canning House, London. It contains the rather embarassing insinuations that there`s a chance Latin America can be saved from ill by becoming a partner of the UK…

“I believe there are four realistic scenarios for Latin America in 2020:

  • First, a secure, prosperous continent working in partnership with the UK on global issues;
  • Second, a continent where democratic progress stalls, replaced by a new form of caudillo;
  • Third, a continent unable to compete with either Asia in the manufacturing sector or Europe and the US on services, leaving it dependent on its raw materials;
  • Fourth, a continent with a dividing line between prosperous and economically under performing states – with all the political instability that entails.”

Not sure if Lord Triesman has any idea how pompous that kind of statement sounds. Here`s the deal: Latin America let`s us exploit it natural resources and in return gets a pat on the head. Triesman`s words come at the same time tension has again surfaced with the Argentina- as the UK has been sniffing around the Falkland Islands for oil. Hey Triesman- let`s not try to kid the UK public that we`re interested in real partnership.

And the UK Government`s not even that bothered about the rights of islanders- the case of the Chagos Islands clarified that little misrepresentation of the Falklands war. Hey- and let`s not even mention Belize! Nuff said. Triesman please put a diplomatic sock in it.

Print Friendly

This photo is thanks to Cristen. The women involved were from the various schools in the town of Livingston, Guatemala. They marched in a parade through town with handmade posters, gathered in the park and listened to various speakers, and participated in performances for the people watching. It was part of many marches organised around Guatemala for International Women's Day on 8th March. Many were specifically part of the campaign against violence against women in Guatemala. The day was celebrated by Central America Women's Network (CAWN) amongst others who recently had a speaker from Guatemala here in the UK.

We've heard that Amnesty International is planning a series of events as part of the culmination of the campaign against violence against women in early May (probably 1st-13th). We'll be able to confirm this and give more details about the events themselves which should involve a speaker from Guatemala soon.

Print Friendly

1,000 US marines are coming to Guatemala to carry out humanitarian work in San Marcos. The announcement received a bit of coverage in the press back in November when Congress approved the move, but little now with the programmed deployment starting in February [there's now been an article in Prensa Libre 13-02-2007]. The US Ambassador James Derham described the reason for the initiative in a statement as:

“This humanitarian exercise provides the United States the opportunity to deploy and train Military Reserve and National Guard troops.”

The Frente Nacional de Lucha called the arrival of US troops in Guatemala a threat to peace. They quoted Sandino Asturias, Centro de Estudios de Guatemala (CEG) who disputed how 'humanitarian' the intentions are:

“Para nadie es un secreto el interés geopolítico de los Estados Unidos en la región y en particular en Guatemala. Aquí lo grave es que en esencia se trata del uso del territorio guatemalteco para entrenar tropas militares extranjeras. Eso es una flagrante violación a la soberanía nacional. El hecho que lo disfracen de obras sociales y de infraestructura tiene aún otro objetivo perverso: el acostumbrar a la población a la presencia de las tropas norteamericanas y que de alguna forma ésta sea aceptable por el público en general.”

Whatever the truth it's not hard to be cynical when this same programme of 'Nuevos Horizontes' is repeated all across the region each year since 1995: Dominican Republic, Peru, Nicaragua, Panama, El Salvador, etc. Given the timing- just in the run up to the elections, let's hope there's not a repeat of interference the US demonstrated in Nicaragua (according to the OAS) last year.

Background

Nuevos Horizontes/ New Horizons is an engineer humanitarian civic assistance exercise designed to give training to U.S. military units in civilian construction or medical care services. Participating U.S. troops build basic infrastructure (roads, bridges, schools, wells, etc.) and provide medical, dental and veterinary services. Information from a 'Civilian's guide to U.S. defence and security assistance to Latin America'.

From Guatemala to Colombia: The Regional Integration of Gold and Bullets is an article in ZNET by Sandra Cuffe that analyzes the role of militarization as a part of the control of territory, natural resources and people, and raises doubts about the so-called war on drug trafficking in mining districts.  A comparison is drawn between Plan Colombia and the current situation in the gold mining region of San Marcos, Guatemala.

More on US interference in the Nicaraguan election from Quest for Peace.


Photo: SOAW

It's also worth noting the irony that these humanitarian military manoeuvres are taking place while a US court is showing great 'humanity' jailing, on counts of trespass, peaceful protestors against WHINSEC (previously known as the School of the Americas) blamed for military-led human rights abuses across Latin America. Many graduates of the school trained in the US were from the Guatemalan military and are amongst those cited by various reports and legal actions for their responsibility in gross human rights violations.
Print Friendly


Photo of Geoffrey Clifton-Brown Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
(Cotswold, Conservative) | Hansard source

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what her policy is on the proposed International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala; and whether the UK plans to offer any support to this body.



Photo of Geoff Hoon Geoff Hoon
(Minister of State (Europe), Foreign & Commonwealth Office) | Hansard source

The situation in Guatemala
has improved since the signing of the Peace Accords in 1996, following
36 years of conflict. However, we continue to be concerned by the
growth of organised crime, the activities of gangs and the widespread
impunity which threatens the rule of law in Guatemala. We therefore very much support the creation of an International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala and are working closely with EU partners and the international community to help ensure its effectiveness.


Hey Geoff- you're beginning to sound a bit like a broken record :-) We'll be looking into what exactly the UK Government means when it says: “working closely…” and “help ensure its effectiveness”. Sound a little like warm words without much substance- but when we identify what this 'substantially' means- we'll let you know.

The background to this was Guatemala's government signing an agreement (12-12-2006) with the United Nations creating a special commission to identify clandestine Guatemalan security groups and help the government dismantle them.

The new International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala will be led by a commissioner to be named by the U.N. secretary-general and will have an initial two-year mandate. You can see from this Reuters report.

Print Friendly

The Interamerican Commission on Human Rights has accepted to investigate a femicide case for the first time. More than a hundred letters were sent from a range of different organisations, urging the Commission to look into the case of 15-year old María Isabel Veliz. María Isabel was found dead on 18th December 2001 in an abandoned piece of land in Ciudad San Cristobal, zone 8 Mixco, Guatemala. It's been Maria Isabel's mother, Rosa Franco, who has taken the initiative after five years of being denied access to justice.

The forensic report revealed that Maria Isabel had been sexually assaulted, had her skull crushed, showed signs of being strangled and had her feet tied with barbed wire.

This case is the first murder of a woman in the country to reach the Commission. It's hoped that the CIDH will issue a resolution recommending that, assuming the case remains uninvestigated by the Guatemalan authorities, it should be sent to the Interamerican Court.

This news coincided with a call by women's organisations in Guatemala denoucing the impunity in the country. They pointed out that of 2,796 murders of women in the last few years, only 20 have gone to court and got a conviction.

The following in Spanish is from the Guatemalan Human Rights Commission weekly news report:

“Mujeres integrantes de 12 organizaciones sociales analizaron, en la sede de la CSJ, la problemática que se tiene en el proceso de investigación, aseguraron que en estos años ha habido avances, pero no los esperados; aún falta mucho para terminar con la impunidad, sentenció Giovanna Lemus, de la Red de la No Violencia.

En lo que va de este año han muerto de forma violenta 485 mujeres, 825 han sido violadas y 10 mil 84 han sufrido agresiones físicas por parte de sus esposos, parejas o ex convivientes.

Es evidente que el número de asesinatos supera la capacidad del Estado, pero pedimos a las autoridades del ramo que no se dediquen a dar una mala imagen de las víctimas para justificar su incapacidad, añadió Lemus.

Las organizaciones pidieron al Gobierno que asigne el presupuesto para poner en práctica programas de prevención. El Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales (IECCP) expuso la falta de coordinación entre la Policía Nacional, el Ministerio Público y el Organismo Judicial, lo cual origina que no se resuelvan los casos de crímenes violentos contra mujeres.

En el análisis se detalla que la carencia de procedimientos científicos, de pruebas de ADN, de laboratorios, de presupuesto y de personal, entre otros, hace que los procesos queden impunes.  Ya que de cada 100 casos que se llevan en la provincia, sólo dos se resuelven efectivamente, mientras que en la capital se logran resolver sólo tres. Ese tipo de estadística demuestra que estamos en una completa impunidad, explicó Marco Antonio Canteo, coordinador del área de investigación del IECCP.”

Violence against women was the subject of a rare article in The Economist (16-11-2006) about Guatemala. One of the first articles in the UK to mention to the 10th anniversary of peace accords:

“Ten years after the signing of the peace accords that ended the war, many people say that the country does not feel much more secure. In a year's time, Guatemala will hold a general election. The country urgently needs new political leadership and a change of direction.”

UPDATE: This news from El Periodico or Siglo XXI (25-11-06)

“En el marco del Día Internacional de la No Violencia Contra las Mujeres, la Coordinadora 25 de Noviembre, que aglutina a diversas organizaciones e instancias de mujeres en el país, le exigieron a la Corte Suprema de Justicia (CSJ) que se agilice la administración de justicia en los casos de violencia contra dicho género, que se cumplan las sentencias contra los responsables de las muertes violentas y que los jueces y magistrados se apeguen al cumplimiento de las leyes y procedimientos.”


A recent episode, 5th November 2006, of Libre Encuentro (hosted by Guatemalan business supremo Dionisio Gutierrez) tackled the issue of violence against women: “Seguridad Ciudadana Y Situación De Violencia En El Pais“. The programme featured a discussion between leading Guatemalan campaigners: Norma Cruz, Directora Fundación Sobrevivientes; María Eugenia Morales de Sierra, Procuradora de los Derechos Humanos en Funciones; Carmen Aída Ibarra, Fundación Myrna Mack.

Print Friendly